Tuesday, 21 July 2020

Music and left-to-right Hebrew

What is left-to-right Hebrew? It is what is called SimHebrew.

SimHebrew is very effective as an abbreviation for Unicode characters within a computer program. I took a similar approach 15 years ago when I was developing my analytical tools for Hebrew. I recently converted my approach to SimHebrew. It is not quite what I was used to, but the lower case is a great improvement over an uppercase transcription. What I am still getting used to is a new pronunciation response.
Hebrew Square Letters
א ב ג ד ה ו ז ח ט י כ ל מ נ ס ע פ צ ק ר ש ת
My first abbreviation for internal programming usage is close to a standard keyboard layout
T W R Q C P ` S N M L K Y + X Z V H D G B )
Sim Hebrew
t w r q x p y s n m l c i 't k z v h d g b a
I still use + internally for tet. Presented SimHebrew uses an escaped t. On the above, here's a note from Jonathan Orr-Stav, the inventor of SimHebrew:
As for y standing in for ayin: remember that it's only the 19th-century German linguists who decided on the phonetic mapping of the Hebrew alphabet to the Latin (German) one, in ignorance of the historical relationship between the two that decided that yod should be mapped to y. Historically, yod is the ancestor of iota (the clue's in the name), and is therefore should be mapping to i. The Old Hebrew/Canaanite ayin looked like an O and so was downgraded by the ancient Greeks to represent the vowel O, but in its Square Hebrew form serendipitously looks like a lowercase y, so its true function as a carrier of any vowel can be restored in SimHebrew.
The question is, could I show the teamim (accents) with it?

Here is Psalms 35:21 as an example:
וַיַּרְחִ֥יבוּ עָלַ֗י פִּ֫יהֶ֥ם
אָ֭מְרוּ הֶאָ֣ח ׀ הֶאָ֑ח
רָאֲתָ֥ה עֵינֵֽינוּ
I did an early experiment that produced something like this.
virkfibu ylvi p<ihfm
agmru haBk haAk
ratfh yineinu
This is readable much like tonic sol-fa. For the accents below the text I have used the note names that you should move to: f is the reciting note for all except the first note e of the first colon. It has a mordent approaching the ole-veyored, the cadence on the supertonic. g is the reciting note then B then A for the second colon, coming to rest on the subdominant. f then e carries the third colon. (Lower case letters are the octave containing middle c, upper case are the next higher octave. A singer would have to 'know' the symbols for the ornaments.

Could I add the music to the transcribed left-to-right Hebrew. One major problem is to restore the music having removed it to manage pairs of consonants. The rendition below is experimental and reveals another problem, the potential confusion of a dotted I with other diacritics. To deal with that I super-scripted even further the accents above the text. You can easily map the Hebrew symbols to the letters and forms that I used above.
virk֥ibu yl֗i p֫ih֥m
a֭mru ha֣k ha֑k
rat֥h yinֽinu
None of these results has much promise or much use. One does not need cantillation symbols in a URL, and singers need more than SimHebrew can give them in its present state.

One thing is clear from the exercise I have done of translating the Westminster Leningrad Codex to SimHebrew and in doing this, comparing the WLC with the maleh (unpointed with standardized spelling) text, letter by letter. There is no impact in the music on pronunciation. The music (accents) and the vowels (and a few confused and confusing jots) are clearly separate magisteria. The systems are completely independent of each other. This allows the music to have arisen from a separate consideration than preserving pronunciation. I think it is likely that the music is older than the vowels. For tone of voice, see this comparison here (A clearer summary of the accents you may never see).

Here is the music with my home-grown transcription (Mode 3, Lydian, major-minor with C♮).
Psalms 35:21
It is quite possible to learn to sight-read the music of the original Hebrew using Haïk-Vantoura's deciphering key without a score. Notice that this verse is a tri-colon marked out by two inner cadences, the first an ole-veyored on the supertonic, the second via the atnah on the subdominant.

Monday, 20 July 2020

The Trussing of Isaac

This score was created last month. I had forgotten I had done it. I had also forgotten, though I knew it was there, the original post for this episode. I was easy to find because it is the only post on this blog where you will find 'trussed' as a gloss. (At least it was until now.) What is unique in the Bible must be unique in the translation.

How can I possibly compare an English rendition of this song with the Hebrew singing noted in that post?

I have set the voice of God and the voice of Isaac with the same trio of forces. SAA. This is a trinity of hope that the practice of child sacrifice may be removed from the lexicon of human activity. But the English speech rhythm has to be performed by a baritone of considerable skill, as is the Hebrew performance. It is beyond my ability to simulate this with a synthesizer.


Now if you bring up the pdf in full screen and listen to the Hebrew while following the score, you can wonder if the English can be rendered. You will see plenty of decisions in the management of a different language rhythm. I have also changed the mode for the last phrases.

This is what I have been doing in part during this blogging silence. Besides this music for what I have called the Pentecost project, and setting Ruth 1 in a process of preparing it for a solo performance, I have been deeply into the 'letters' of the psalms examining the code that allows me to translate the haser text of the WLC to the malé (unpointed) text for conversion to SimHebrew. This has been a nightmare of coding. But the algorithms are simplifying and may yield something of the mind of modern Hebrew compared to the medieval.

Wednesday, 1 July 2020

Biblical Studies Carnival

The latest carnival is here, Its the ‘Pandemic / Societal Apocalypse / Is June Finally Over? / Ugh What a Miserable Month’ Edition of the Biblical Studies Carnival

Jim has some very interesting articles that he found last month. For me, this lead article on the Washington Pentateuch is fascinating, as is the commentary on Tr--p and the Bible by James Crossley.

I am doing the carnival for July, so let me know if you have or find any interesting posts. I confess I have not been following blogs for several months and the posts just accumulate - but hopefully some useful theme will emerge this month and I will find at least some posts as interesting as Jim's collection.

Tuesday, 23 June 2020

What is heard on Sunday mornings

I hope you don't mind sharing my gradual journey as I discover more of the tradition I have known these past 10 decades. As I noted, there is some considered analysis of the readings at the liturgica blog by Doug Chaplin. I am most grateful that he has done this.

I have lots of questions. The first was what portion of the Hebrew Bible is read on Sundays and major Festivals if one uses the RCL. The result surprised me. I noted in my book on the Psalms that some traditions have little experience with the Psalms.
It is clear that not all liturgical traditions make use of the Psalter. ... Here are two examples:
1.       I guess my question about the psalms is with regard to the key theological concepts of the New Testament: grace, justification, the fruits of the Spirit, love. These all seem to be missing in the psalms and thus we can’t really embrace them as representative of our New Covenant experience. Second, the ideas of community and family seem lacking while nation seems to be overly prominent in ways that I don’t know how to appropriate. [From a professional Bible translator with many years’ experience in Greek.]
2.        I’ve been looking for ways to appropriate the Psalms in my own devotional life. They are practically non-existent, as far as the Free Churches that I know go. The one I’m at now is an exception, in that we read a Psalm about once a month. [From a doctoral student in Biblical Studies.]

One could write another book with just these opinions as a stimulus. I hope they are no longer true today among 'the elect'.

Anyone who follows the RCL will not lack for reading of the Psalms. Here is the rough proportion, the number of times we open a book, that is regularly read or sung.

Proportion of the Books of the Hebrew Scripture 'opened' in the three year cycle of the Revised Common Lectionary
This is not a bad result. The Psalms are by far the most popular book of the Hebrew Scriptures. And there is nothing lacking of grace, justification, the fruits of the Spirit, love in this book, or when you read it, the rest of the Tanakh.

I was thinking this morning that even the great 1 Corinthians 13 is a reflection on the character of Yahweh as portrayed consistently in Tanakh (Exodus 34:6). The attitude we have towards this history needs a radical change from the punitive model of our 16th century.

So that is what we read - but it highlights also what we do not read.
A few chapters from Torah, at least one from each book. A few from the former prophets and some from each of the major prophets, 10 of the 12 minor prophets. Two of the remainder, missing out Ezra and Chronicles entirely.

We read from the Psalms over 300 times, but we only cover pieces of 102 chapters. If I took this down to the verse level, the percentages would be lower.

Yahweh doesn't have good press from the Churches, so it's no wonder Christians read so little, but in the RCL tradition, what we read is considerably more than nothing. The top five are Psalms, Isaiah, Genesis, Deuteronomy and Jeremiah. (I am still asking myself why this hireling is administrating, composing, and programming during a pandemic. O my overworked obsessions!)
Book
Chapters
Opened
Chapters Read
Percent
GENESIS
50
43
21
42.00
EXODUS
40
29
13
32.50
LEVITICUS
27
1
1
3.70
NUMBERS
36
10
3
8.33
DEUTERONOMY
34
12
7
20.59
JOSHUA
24
4
3
12.50
JUDGES
21
1
1
4.76
1 SAMUEL
31
13
7
22.58
2 SAMUEL
24
9
7
29.17
1 KINGS
22
8
5
22.73
2 KINGS
25
5
3
12.00
ISAIAH
66
84
30
45.45
JEREMIAH
52
26
16
30.77
EZEKIEL
48
14
7
14.58
HOSEA
14
2
2
14.29
JOEL
4
5
1
25.00
AMOS
9
7
4
44.44
JONAH
4
2
1
25.00
MICAH
7
3
3
42.86
HABAKKUK
3
4
1
33.33
ZEPHANIAH
3
5
2
66.67
HAGGAI
2
1
1
50.00
ZECHARIAH
14
1
1
7.14
MALACHI
3
6
2
66.67
PSALMS
150
332
102
68.00
PROVERBS
31
11
6
19.35
JOB
42
10
6
14.29
SONG
8
1
1
12.50
RUTH
4
2
2
50.00
LAMENTATIONS
5
6
2
40.00
QOHELET
12
5
3
25.00
ESTHER
10
1
1
10.00
DANIEL
12
3
2
16.67
NEHEMIAH
13
1
1
7.69